Posts Tagged ‘ photographer ’

it’s only the end of the world.

Listening to: Panic! At the Disco — Nails For Breakfast, Tacks For Snacks

Let me begin with a complaint: my coccyx aches. I just had my weave taken out and my hair wrangled into single braids, so now I’m blonder than ever. Firefox crashed every time I tried to upload this header photo and every time I turn on any sort of media all I hear about is news of death and destruction and even more impending doom. Maybe we set the year 0A.D. too far back and it’s already the Mayans’ 2012, and we’re all going to die (well, we are anyway, eventually, and I don’t actually believe that 2012 is Armageddon because Ragnarok should totally come on a February 31st).

On Saturday I went house shopping with my aunt and cousin and enjoyed petting other people’s cats and debating doors vs. windows as sniper targets (my cousin doesn’t want to live in a house with lots of windows, because “nobody’s ever been shot through a door;” I told her I was going to shoot her through a door just to prove her wrong). I won a silver medal for a double exposure LC-A+ print in the national Scholastic Art Awards, despite my photography teacher’s telling me not to hold my breath waiting to win anything. And I’ve planned an epic photoshoot with Blé for Friday inspired by:

but in suburbia and with cheaper clothes (obviously, since stylist/photographer anwa has a nonexistent clothes budget and all the shmancy vintage dresses she just inherited from her mother are at the cleaner’s). Have I ever mentioned that I love love love Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott, possibly definitely even more than I love Annie Leibovitz (okay, definitely definitely more)? But I’m having a crisis of method in deciding whether to shoot this shoot in digital or in film, but I’m kind of leaning towards the film because then I get to use all of my better lenses AND I will take a “behind the scenes” little photo-movie with my new Flip camera to make up for the fact that it’ll take way too long to get the prints developed.

a shameless manipulation.

Listening to: Eluvium — Reciting the Airships

Usually, I don’t do much manipulation on my digital photos. Sure, where necessary I’ll touch up on brightness and contrast or fix some really ugly yellow light, but I DO not airbrush or extensively ‘Shop in things that are supposed to, well, actually look like photographs. So, when I stumbled upon Nirrimi’s Color Shop, I just had to stop and think for awhile. Now, we all know that most of fashion photography is a shameless manipulation, but — really? Seeing how you can make even the most mediocre of photographs amazing with the click of a button makes one wonder what’s the photographer’s actual style behind the lens and what’s made to look a certain way post-production. (And also — $35 per action? An action that I could make myself in two minutes? Well, I guess that nothing’s too expensive if there’s someone willing to pay for it.) I’m not against the process, really, or even the Color Shop itself — Nirrimi is still one of my favorite contemporary photographers and a huge inspiration for young artists — but the whole thing, I dunno, just shakes my faith a little. Makes me wonder.

But I was so fascinated with the concept that I spent a bit of time making a few of my own curves/actions on the GIMP, one of which I used on the photo above (does that change the way you think of that photo? because it does for me). Here’s a really low-quality GIF that I spent oodles of time making for comparison:

So, what do you think? Yay, or nay?

–> So, we’ve been kinda surviving the Snowpocalypse over here. And by “kinda,” I mean that our school set classes back until 9am yesterday (even though it was a half day and all the games were canceled, they refused to cancel classes), and half the school called left because the ‘rents thought that OMG MY SNOOKUMS IS GOING TO FREEZE. Break actually starts today, so once I finish packing I’m leaving for the city.

russia is likely more photogenic, though the snow here sparkles like flakes of glitter.

Listening to: Frou Frou — Breathe In

IT’S SNOWING HERE! But of course my joy had to be dampened with the knowledge that there’s more than 15cm of snow back at homsies. Sigh. Yesterday was exciting;  I learned how to play squash (but I will still call it squish); our boy’s varsity team won 1-0; and it seemed that between 9pm and 11:30 too many people were a bit too tipsy. But now everyone’s awake and not-expelled, so all is well in the land of Über-Prep.

As promised, I have a short story for you. It’s not the one that’s being published tomorrow, because that one’s far too long (4+ pages!) for a meager blog post such as this. This one is titled the soulcage.

They awoke early to the rooster’s nasal caw. He strutted up and down the hall, pecking them out of their cubbyholes, nipping at their sore heels. The girls emerged from their nests like bees from a hive. some stepped down on their toes like the ballerinas they’d once longed to be; others slumped and slipped and slithered like mud snakes. When they were all out, the rooster swaggered about them in a few loose circles, examining with a dull black eye the sad and tired countenances on their beautiful faces. Then, with the order to prepare themselves, he sent them out a small hatch door hidden behind their cubicles.

–You’re lucky. You look so ugly today.

–What are you talking about? We’re all super pretty, remember? We’re beautiful.

–IF YOU DO NOT PREEN WELL, WE WILL DISPOSE OF YOU.

The girls washed their faces above cracked mirrors in a tiny room with walls of peeling lead paint. They searched, hopefully, for new blemishes on their flawless skin, complimenting each other on their bed head and morning breath. They sighed over the beautiful clothes that the weaverbird gave them, clothes that in another life they would have coveted. This splendor only reinforced the irony of their plight: they were imprisoned because of their beauty; this was meant to be a gift. If they had been less appealing to the eye, they would be free.

–My feet! They expect me to walk all day in these?

–Well, you did it yesterday, didn’t you?

–QUIET! NO ONE COMES HERE TO HEAR YOU SPEAK.

When they started walking, the sky was gray. Nobody fed them at all that morning, which was okay with the girls – if they became emaciated and their hair began to fall out, they might be sent home, and anyway it was difficult to walk on a full stomach. Even though there were few observers beyond their glass cage, the girls filed out of the hatch door and down the hall in a long procession of stiletto heels and Fabergé eggs in birds’ nests of hair. Their footsteps echoed off the checkerboard marble floor, bouncing off the endless walls and ringing deep within their eardrums.

Ohmigod!

–Is she okay?

–WHO ASKED YOU TO STOP WALKING?

One of the models dropped with fatigue halfway through their first walk of the hall. The crow who stood guard by the singular door became enraged, screeching that it was their task to please the audience. Not that the audience was unentertained by the young girl’s plight – catastrophe was drama, after all, and watching humans simply walk was amusing for only so long.  From where she lay on a moldy couch near their cubbyholes, the sick girl watched her compatriots promenade. The clouds pressed against the windows above them, heavy like a sheet of dark lead poised to drop and bury shards of glass into their souls. But they knew that the glass would never break, just as they knew that only such a death would ever end their torment.

If it rains, and the birds leave, do you think that they’ll let us go back to sleep?

The idea is that you’re supposed to be able to read the left-aligned stuff with the right-aligned italics like fragmented thoughts/overheard words in the back of your mind. It works for some people, not so much for others.

I’m reading Animal Farm right now. It sucks how well-intentioned governments devolve, no? Hobbes is right; everyone fails at morality. Life sucks.

But not really. And that’s because we have PHOTOGRAPHY, which those poor saps on the Animal Farm never had. Here is a little blurb about said art form that I wrote for the art mag:

My camera is a gun. Sometimes people duck before I shoot, but I don’t shoot to kill — I shoot to capture. With my weapon of mass depiction, I hunt down beautiful moments. If they’re not beautiful to begin with, I’ll make them that way or fill my SD card trying. That’s part of why I love photography: with every picture I take, I can save something fleeting and make once-in-a-lifetime last a lifetime. I can rewrite history, stop time, and make fiction a reality. And after spending so much time behind a lens, life becomes more photogenic. I lift my spirits with the knowledge that even my darkest moments could look great on film. Then I can remind myself that life isn’t always so dark; in photos, all the world is a play of light.

I’m sure that I’ve mentioned before that almost all of my favorite photographers are Russians/ Eastern Europeans, which really doesn’t help with my obsession with that part of the world. One film photographer in particular goes by the name Oprisco; I don’t know his real name, but his stuff is kinda awesome, even if his entire website is pretty much gibberish to me ‘cuz it’s in Russian. But here is some of his work:

Stunning,  no? He also makes me really want a medium format camera so that I can shoot with 120mm film. Maybe one day I’ll ask for a Diana, even if the people on Flickr would disapprove. Yes; if you hadn’t noticed, the photographia link has been changed from my Carbonmade portfolio to my newly-created Flickr account. Never fear, though — you can still find my Carbonmade via our du sujet de… page.

this is not a profound post.

Listening to: Blue October — Overweight

If you’ve followed this blog for any matter of time, or if you know me personally, you should know that I’m not good at writing long, profound posts. (Or on-topic posts, as a matter of fact…). In person, I can ramble endlessly about something that’s very important to me, but I’m not the type of person who’s able to spill her soul on paper. And too be completely honest, I’m not quite sure what the point of this post is. Obviously, as I said before, it’s not going to be a 500-word rant. I suppose that it’s one of those thoughts that just manage to slip away….

But I stumbled across Elizabeth Soule’s photography today and just thought that I might share a bit of it with you. It’s very thought-provoking, in a delicate kind of way.

 

 

french vogue, please don’t make me barf on your birthday cake.

Listening to: Pony Pony Run Run –1997 (She Said It’s Alright)

_

Those of you who follow this blog or otherwise know me probably know that I have a slight obsession with Vogue Paris. Those of you who read Vogue Paris or are in tune with the fashion industry might know that this month is said magazine’s 90th birthday — yes, the French edition of the most important magazine known to fashion is nearly a century old. I, personally, cannot wait to go  back to Montréal and pick up my copy — and if only I lived in France, because every copy of the 90th anniversary issue bought there comes with a portfolio of oversized prints from the past nine decades. Until then, you can find a few images on Fashionologie.

The issue itself, for that matter, is supposed to be ninety kinds of epic. It’s 622 pages long (albeit with 276 pages of ads and 104 pages of well wishes from designers). Crystal Renn’s in it, and, in case you hadn’t noticed, Lara Stone is on the cover. Photography from both the past’s and the present’s fashion photography greats will be featured, including work by Helmut Newton, Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott, Inez van Lamsweerde, David Sims, Steven Klein, and… Terry Richardson.

Ack. Someone gag me, please.

I’m sure that I’ve mentioned that Terry Richardson’s “art” makes me want to puke. However, I can deal with it in small doses — say, as an unnecessary illustration in an article on jewelry — by ignoring it. It’s like walking past a sewage treatment plant; sometimes you have to plug your nose and keep on walking. However, a seven-page spread is pushing it. Still, though, it could’ve been ignored, but…

…Remember how I mentioned that Crystal Renn has a whole spread to herself? Normally this would be a cause for gratuitous squealing of the stereotypically girly variety. Even as someone who admittedly values the photographer’s work over the model’s, I must say that Crystal Renn is about my favorite model ever, other than Lara Stone. Crystal Renn plus Vogue Paris should be a good thing.

But why does her spread have to be shot by Terry Richardson?

This makes me sad. I like Crystal. I hate Terry. There is an obvious conundrum in how I’m supposed to see the spread without having my corneas burned out by terrible photography. Actually, I have seen the spread; and it’s more horrible than you’d expect. Let me summarize it for you: fugly sweaters, immature sexual references, and copious amounts of food. Apart from the horrendous styling and the fact that Terry Richardson is involved, did they have to make the “OMG THE PLUS-SIZED MODEL IS SO FAT LOOK HOW MUCH SHE EATS” statement? Totally unnecessary, Vogue Paris.

Sigh. I know that I’ll still eat the French Vogue birthday cake. I’ll just have to try not to barf at the disgusting frosting.

pinspiration.

Listening to: Andrew Bird — Cataracts

Pinspiration = Photography + Inspiration. Not to be confused with “thinspiration”, even if the models in more than a few photos are rather gaunt.

I’ve been really frustrated lately. My iTunes isn’t working (Steve Jobs, I see through your ploy to get me to buy a Mac, and that isn’t working, either!) and I haven’t taken any photos that I really, really like in what seems like forever. My current assignment is faculty portraits, which I’m sure my teacher just assigned because he knew that I would hate it. It’s due tomorrow, and everything I’ve shot so far is varying levels of suckish. And to add insult to injury, I have a combination allergy-cold, am covered in bug bites from soccer, and am so sleep-deprived that I can’t keep my (red and itchy) eyes open. So, since I have no new photos of my own to share, here are some of my favorites from around the interwebs.

_

_

_

_

_

_

dayzed.

Listening to: Black Box Recorder — Brutality

_

Wow. I can’t believe that the first “real” week of school is over — conversely, it seems like we’ve been here for at least a month. So much has happened over the past few days, which is weird to think about because here it’s said here that “nothing that happens before or during the weekend of the first dance even counts”. Of course, the aforementioned saying has nothing to do with schoolwork; if all of the homework I’ve been swamped with the first week of school didn’t count, I would have to shoot someone.

Because I’m the only one in my photography class, I (read: my teacher) decided to have only two classes this week. The first one was to receive my assignment (portraits), and the second one was for him to pick apart my studio portraits because 1) I only used — gasp — one model, 2) even though they were all compositionally very good, they “just didn’t do anything for him”, and 3) he flat-out doesn’t like fashion photography. Le sigh. I spent the next canceled class taking stalker-portraits of passers-by, with which I’m sure he will be very happy.

Once when we were preparing for a photo shoot, Blé joked that I’d found my life’s career in applying other people’s eye makeup. The girls of my dorm seem to believe that as well, as they all made me apply theirs before the dance yesterday. In their words: “Ohmigosh, I’m totes having you do my makeup next dance, too!” In my thoughts: “Ohmigosh, you’d better bring five dollars next time!”

Today we watched Mean Girls. I know it puts me at odds with most American females of my generation to say this, but I strongly disliked that movie. It wasn’t the acting or the plot that did it for me; it was the whole “Girl from Africa” premise. Please, filmmakers of Hollywood, quit your colonialism and remember that FOR THE LAST TIME, AFRICA IS NOT A GIANT EMPTY SAFARI FILLED WITH ELEPHANTS AND POOR, IGNORANT TRIBES-PEOPLE. As someone whose family hails from a country that is both African, metropolitan and one of the  most populous in the world, this irks me so much.

On a semi-random style note: I was taking a look at my Pinterest board (yes, I only have one), I noticed that most of my favorite photos are taken my Eastern European, namely Polish, photographers. And while I’d love to chalk that up to Blé’s influence, I think it’s more because so many of them, at least the ones you see on art sites like deviantArt, have a very similar style. I suppose that I try to emulate this very general style, in a way, but I’m better at incorporation than emulation.

That is all. If you read the entirety of this rambling and unfocused post, you deserve a Double-Stuff Oreo.

 

that warm icky feeling.

Listening to: Modest Mouse — Spitting Venom

_

First off: Preseason kills. I walk, sit down, and climb the stairs like someone several decades older. The coach still won’t give me a chance to play what I’m good at, which is goalie, so I’m just sticking to it until they make the official cuts tomorrow and I can release all of my passive-aggressive wrath.

Anywho. It’s time for my long-delayed assessment of the September issue of French Vogue. You know that feeling, when you want something SO badly and feel a mixture of happiness and disappointment? That’s how I felt with this one. For one, most of itwas amazing, in the photography and articles and everything, but one thing kind of spoiled the rest for me. And that one thing was Terry Richardson.

Why, Carine Roitfeld? Why did you have to incorporate so much of his work in places where others could have been used. For one, everybody hates Terry Richardson. He is a creepy model-molesting pervert. He even has a freakin’ molester song, for goodness’ sake. I could go on and on about what’s wrong with him as a person, but enough people have done that already. Now, I’m ranting about his “art”.

To put it bluntly, it sucks. If I submitted one of his pieces to my photography class, I would fail beyond failure. Everything he shoots (I won’t bother inserting any images or even linking to them, because I don’t want to sully the face of my blog — you can use Google, yes?) is the same. I don’t even mean the same as in he has a style, like Annie Leibovitz has a style or Richard Avedon has a style. I like to think that I have a style, but that has to do more with my own taste in images and less with my photos looking like photocopies of each other.

To clarify: Every photo by Terry Richardson has the same basic setup. Usually nude and/or underage-looking female model, standing in front of a blank white wall and shot with the highest flash he can find. They, as I once heard (read?) said, look like amateurish American Apparel ads. Not only are they all shot the same way, but they’re ridiculously uncreative in a composition/styling sense. I mean, I’ve seen people do some pretty creative things with a white wall and a flash bulb. But to see his “art”, you’d think that someone had a photography assignment due in fifteen minutes, was  only taking the class because it was supposed to be an easy A and was a horny misogynist to boot. Whenever I see one of his photos, I vomit in my mouth a little.

And that is how Terry Richardson turned my Vogue Paris warm-fuzzy-feelings into rather icked-out ones.

hey models, you’re great and all but I’m the one pressing the shutter button.

Listening to: Blonde Redhead — Spring And By Summer Fall

_

First off: AAAAAAAAAAAHHHH OMG OMG OMG SHINY NEW NIKON D3000 IN THE MAIL Y’ALL!!!!!

Now that the above inner girly squeal has been released, you have probably gleaned that my new camera is here. Not only is it here, but it is about 5,000 shutter actuations newer (read: better) than my borrowed-from-school one and came all pretty and packaged in its camera box with bubble-wrap. Which might not have been so interesting in of itself if I wasn’t so excited. My Vogue still isn’t at the bookstore here, so I’ll have to buy it in Montréal, but that inconvenience is trivial compared to the fact that I HAVE A NEW CAMERA.

But anyway. The original point of this post was to be a PSA-reminder/ mini-rant about something that irks me: fashion photographers. Or, more specifically, the visibility of said photographers.

Maybe it’s just because my stake in the fashion industry is the photography, but I don’t think that photographers get enough credit for their work. Now, I’m not talking about all of the big names out there — Steven Meisel, Anne Leibovitz, and Corrine Day (may she rest in peace), for example. Pointing out that they’re famous fashion photographers is like saying that Barack Obama is the president of the USA. The photographers I’m talking about could be likened to the governor of Minnesota — they’re definitely doing some work, but how much of the general public can name them off the top of their heads?

The fashion industry in the media is represented primarily by two groups, the designers and the models. These are the people whose influence is more visible and obvious — the clothes are everywhere, and the models are essentially the face of the industry. I could name individuals from both of these groups for quite a while, but even as one I could only tell you the names of a few photographers who aren’t deceased. The way it’s usually portrayed, one would think that models appeared dressed in designer clothing (never mind the work of the anonymous stylists), and the divine forces of the universe swooped down to distill their perfection into a series of images. For example, when discussing a new ad campaign, it’s refereed to as such: [Model's Name] for [Designer's Name]. I’m guilty of this myself, because sometimes it’s just too difficult to find out who framed, shot and edited the images.

It’s easy to forget that without photographers, nobody would ever know what the models and the clothes even look like. Magazines like the one-still-not-delivered-to-my-bookstore would be cover-less, spread-less and ad-less. They, in essence, would not exist, which is why I think it’s good to remember that someone had to work a camera for Coca Rocha to be a lady in Vogue Mexico.

(In Fashionising.com’s defense, they do credit both the photographer and the stylist. You just have to click through a few levels of links to see it.)

a little bit o’ love.

Listening to: Passion Pit — Little Secret

Maybe one day I’ll want that title for something else. But that day is not today, my friends, for I have (somewhat) exciting developments to share with you.

Thing 1:

EA announced the new Sims 3 expansion pack, Late Night, yesterday. Needless to say, I of the Sims obsession/addiction am VERY excited. Rumor has it that it comes out this October, but the official release date hasn’t been announced yet. For any fellow Sims-ers, it’s supposed to be the Sims 3 version of the Sims 2 Nightlife. For everyone else, I’ll let the trailer explain.

Thing 2:

More photo love. Someone who’s work you should definitely check out is Polish photographer Monika Stojak, who is amazing in many ways. To quote, her themes are “human expressions, girls, youth, matte tones and the love for an inverted world”.  Here’s some of her more recent work:



I love her style to death. And it’s ironic, because the styles I like the most are the ones I’m least likely to try to imitate. It goes for clothes as well — if I like what you wear or how you take photos, there’s little chance that I’ll try it too because I don’t want to do it wrong.

Thing 3:

As a furthering in my quest to be completely unrecognizable by the start of the school year, today I obtained contacts. Since I’ve had them before (with, mind you, disastrous results), I was able to put them in and take them out without pulling out my retina as well. But I also got my pupils dilated, so I couldn’t see jack anyway. If my eyes fall out in the next few days, I’ll be sure to let you know by posting a bunch of gibberish.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers